EVR Documentation, July'23 *draft*
  • 2.0 Preface to a Gitbook
  • World Building
    • 1.9 A Primer
    • 1.9 Specific Benefits
    • 2.0 Introducing EVR
    • 2.0 What's in the foreground
    • 2.0 Skimming the surface
    • 1.9 In-app infrastructure
  • Toolkit
    • 1.9 SRS: Social Recognition Software
    • 0.0 Guild structure
    • 0.9 CGS: Community Governance Structure
    • 1.9 dTVET
  • In the world of EVR
    • 0.0 Emergent Patterns
    • 0.0 Applications & Industry
    • 0.0 Buildouts, Reskins, & Modularity
    • 0.0 Member Profiles
  • White paper
    • ⚖️***Philosophy template***
    • 1.0 Reputations: Public & Administrative
      • 1.9 Engagement
      • 1.0 Public Reputation
        • 0.9 Public Reputations: General- & Specific-
        • 0.9 Awards
        • 0.0 Flags
      • 0.0 Administrative Reputation
        • 0.9 Bayes adjustment
        • 0.9 demurrage
        • 1.9 Billings Score
        • 1.9 Culculus score
    • 1.9 Guild
      • 0.9 Reputation of guilds
      • 1.0 Parent & Daughter guilds
        • 0.0 Seed Guild
        • 0.0 Regional Language Family
        • 1.0 Guild Creation
        • 0.9 Member
      • 0.9 Ordinal Guild
        • 0.9 Acquisition - Integration _ Proliferation
          • 0.9 Skillset Decay
          • 0.9 Relational Dynamic Adjustment
          • 0.9 Advancement
          • 0.9 Level
        • 0.9 Sourcing and Revising Standards
          • 0.9 Safe Work Practices
          • 0.9 Certifying Body
          • 0.0 Practical Factors (rename)
          • 0.9 Fundamental Domain Competencies
          • 0.9 Standard Operating Procedures
          • 0.9 Guild Certification
    • 1.9 Community Governance Structure
      • 0.8 EVR Community
      • 1.5 Content Moderation
      • 0.9 Code of conduct
      • 0.0 Content
      • 1.0 Disputed Content
        • 1.0 Dilemmas Ethical and Procedural
          • 0.9 Unethical
          • 1.0 Unfitting
      • 0.9 Arbitration Process
        • 0.0 Brief
        • 0.0 Proposal
        • 1.0 Arbitration Threshold
        • 0.0 Determination
        • 0.0 Resolution / Dismissal
        • 1.0 Arbitrating Members
        • 0.0 Activity Status
      • 0.0 Reporting Member
      • 1.0 Potenza Threshold
    • 1.0 EVR Team
      • 0.9 Disaster Relief Protocols
      • 1.0 Ikigai Insights
  • Blue Paper
    • ***Form & function Template***
    • 1.0 Reputations: Public & Administrative
      • 1.9 Engagement
      • 0.9 Public Reputation
        • 0.9 Public Reputation: General- & Specific-
        • 0.1 Flags
      • 0.0 Demurrage
      • 1.0 Bays adjustment
      • 0.0 Awards
    • 1.0 Guild
      • 0.0 Reputation of Guilds
      • 0.9 Guild rep
      • 1.0 Guild Creation
      • 0.0 Seed Guild
      • 0.9 Ordinal Guild
      • 0.9 Guild Certification
      • 0.9 Standard Operating Procedures
      • 0.0 Fundamental Domain Competencies
      • 0.9 Certifying Body
      • 0.9 Acquisition - Integration _ Proliferation
      • 0.9 Sourcing and Revising Standards
      • 0.0 Parent & Daughter guilds
      • 1.0 Member
      • 0.0 Advancement
      • 1.0 EVR Community
      • 0.9 Skillset Decay
      • 0.9 Safe Work Practives
      • 0.9 Level
      • 0.9 Practical Factors (rename)
      • 0.9 Relational Dynamic Adjustment
    • 1.9 Community Governance Structure
      • 1.5 Content Moderation
      • 1.0 Potenza Threshold
      • 1.0 Arbitration Threshold
      • 1.0 Arbitration Process
      • 1.8 Billings Score
      • 0.9 Dilemmas: Ethical and Procedural
      • 1.0 Unfitting
      • 1.0 Unethical
      • 0.0 Activity Status
      • 1.0 Resolution / Dismissal
      • 1.0 Arbitrating Members
      • 1.0 Regional Language Family
      • 1.0 Reporting Member
      • 1.0 Disputed content
      • 1.0 Determination
      • 0.0 Content
      • 0.0 Code of Conduct
      • 1.8 Cuculus score
      • 0.0 Proposal
      • 1.0 Brief
    • 0.0 EVR Team
      • 0.9 Ikigai Insights
      • 0.9 EVR Team
      • 0.0 Disaster Relief Protocols
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Blue Paper
  2. 1.9 Community Governance Structure

1.0 Unethical

Repugnant content not limited to that which violates Code of Conduct

Previous1.0 UnfittingNext0.0 Activity Status

Last updated 1 year ago

Overview

One of two justifications for Flagging a piece of Content.

Used to protect human/environmental health and safety, and maintain a disposition online

Designates an Ethical dilemma and triggers the Arbitration Process that follows.

Where it occurs/ how we initiate it

A piece of Content may be flagged as Unethical by any member of the EVR community

Philosophy