EVR Documentation, July'23 *draft*
  • 2.0 Preface to a Gitbook
  • World Building
    • 1.9 A Primer
    • 1.9 Specific Benefits
    • 2.0 Introducing EVR
    • 2.0 What's in the foreground
    • 2.0 Skimming the surface
    • 1.9 In-app infrastructure
  • Toolkit
    • 1.9 SRS: Social Recognition Software
    • 0.0 Guild structure
    • 0.9 CGS: Community Governance Structure
    • 1.9 dTVET
  • In the world of EVR
    • 0.0 Emergent Patterns
    • 0.0 Applications & Industry
    • 0.0 Buildouts, Reskins, & Modularity
    • 0.0 Member Profiles
  • White paper
    • ⚖️***Philosophy template***
    • 1.0 Reputations: Public & Administrative
      • 1.9 Engagement
      • 1.0 Public Reputation
        • 0.9 Public Reputations: General- & Specific-
        • 0.9 Awards
        • 0.0 Flags
      • 0.0 Administrative Reputation
        • 0.9 Bayes adjustment
        • 0.9 demurrage
        • 1.9 Billings Score
        • 1.9 Culculus score
    • 1.9 Guild
      • 0.9 Reputation of guilds
      • 1.0 Parent & Daughter guilds
        • 0.0 Seed Guild
        • 0.0 Regional Language Family
        • 1.0 Guild Creation
        • 0.9 Member
      • 0.9 Ordinal Guild
        • 0.9 Acquisition - Integration _ Proliferation
          • 0.9 Skillset Decay
          • 0.9 Relational Dynamic Adjustment
          • 0.9 Advancement
          • 0.9 Level
        • 0.9 Sourcing and Revising Standards
          • 0.9 Safe Work Practices
          • 0.9 Certifying Body
          • 0.0 Practical Factors (rename)
          • 0.9 Fundamental Domain Competencies
          • 0.9 Standard Operating Procedures
          • 0.9 Guild Certification
    • 1.9 Community Governance Structure
      • 0.8 EVR Community
      • 1.5 Content Moderation
      • 0.9 Code of conduct
      • 0.0 Content
      • 1.0 Disputed Content
        • 1.0 Dilemmas Ethical and Procedural
          • 0.9 Unethical
          • 1.0 Unfitting
      • 0.9 Arbitration Process
        • 0.0 Brief
        • 0.0 Proposal
        • 1.0 Arbitration Threshold
        • 0.0 Determination
        • 0.0 Resolution / Dismissal
        • 1.0 Arbitrating Members
        • 0.0 Activity Status
      • 0.0 Reporting Member
      • 1.0 Potenza Threshold
    • 1.0 EVR Team
      • 0.9 Disaster Relief Protocols
      • 1.0 Ikigai Insights
  • Blue Paper
    • ***Form & function Template***
    • 1.0 Reputations: Public & Administrative
      • 1.9 Engagement
      • 0.9 Public Reputation
        • 0.9 Public Reputation: General- & Specific-
        • 0.1 Flags
      • 0.0 Demurrage
      • 1.0 Bays adjustment
      • 0.0 Awards
    • 1.0 Guild
      • 0.0 Reputation of Guilds
      • 0.9 Guild rep
      • 1.0 Guild Creation
      • 0.0 Seed Guild
      • 0.9 Ordinal Guild
      • 0.9 Guild Certification
      • 0.9 Standard Operating Procedures
      • 0.0 Fundamental Domain Competencies
      • 0.9 Certifying Body
      • 0.9 Acquisition - Integration _ Proliferation
      • 0.9 Sourcing and Revising Standards
      • 0.0 Parent & Daughter guilds
      • 1.0 Member
      • 0.0 Advancement
      • 1.0 EVR Community
      • 0.9 Skillset Decay
      • 0.9 Safe Work Practives
      • 0.9 Level
      • 0.9 Practical Factors (rename)
      • 0.9 Relational Dynamic Adjustment
    • 1.9 Community Governance Structure
      • 1.5 Content Moderation
      • 1.0 Potenza Threshold
      • 1.0 Arbitration Threshold
      • 1.0 Arbitration Process
      • 1.8 Billings Score
      • 0.9 Dilemmas: Ethical and Procedural
      • 1.0 Unfitting
      • 1.0 Unethical
      • 0.0 Activity Status
      • 1.0 Resolution / Dismissal
      • 1.0 Arbitrating Members
      • 1.0 Regional Language Family
      • 1.0 Reporting Member
      • 1.0 Disputed content
      • 1.0 Determination
      • 0.0 Content
      • 0.0 Code of Conduct
      • 1.8 Cuculus score
      • 0.0 Proposal
      • 1.0 Brief
    • 0.0 EVR Team
      • 0.9 Ikigai Insights
      • 0.9 EVR Team
      • 0.0 Disaster Relief Protocols
Powered by GitBook

0.9 demurrage

Philosophy

Nothing is permanent, who you are today wont be who you are tomorrow. If you don't look back on the person you were 5 years ago and cringe... you're doing something wrong.

We develop skills along the way,

Just as tangible skillsets develop of diminish over time, so too our preferences, our opinions,

We all need the space to grow, and time provides that,

Held accountable without being held back.

________State of the art:

Simplistic reviews are incorporated in a binary fashion: either they are counted before a certain date, or they are not expired after a certain time. They make no distinction between historical and contemporary experiences.

Our solution:

We apply a sigmoid function to our reviews. Contemporary reviews are considered the most relevant, historical reviews less so. As time passes the weight of prior reviews approaches Zero. this is our way of keeping up to date on the latest changes in product/person experiences.

Justification:

People/products/companies change, its important to reflect that. The sum of a person is more than their best or worst moment. People change over time, fucking let them! Let it be oay that we’re better than we were before. Don’t hold us to a standard of expectation that wever surpassed a long time past. Don’t pigeon hole us into the same box we came from. Let us evolve, let us become more than we once were. Thats the naturall progression of the human, from “cringe” to “woke”, its a fucking process. We can do better if only we’re allowed to. With all gratitude to the flks whove come before us, whole taught us, whove changed our minds. Let us become more than we are now. Let us grow, let us refine, let us Become.

Examples

lorem

Form and Function

Previous0.9 Bayes adjustmentNext1.9 Billings Score

Last updated 1 year ago

On this page
Page cover image