EVR Documentation, July'23 *draft*
  • 2.0 Preface to a Gitbook
  • World Building
    • 1.9 A Primer
    • 1.9 Specific Benefits
    • 2.0 Introducing EVR
    • 2.0 What's in the foreground
    • 2.0 Skimming the surface
    • 1.9 In-app infrastructure
  • Toolkit
    • 1.9 SRS: Social Recognition Software
    • 0.0 Guild structure
    • 0.9 CGS: Community Governance Structure
    • 1.9 dTVET
  • In the world of EVR
    • 0.0 Emergent Patterns
    • 0.0 Applications & Industry
    • 0.0 Buildouts, Reskins, & Modularity
    • 0.0 Member Profiles
  • White paper
    • ⚖️***Philosophy template***
    • 1.0 Reputations: Public & Administrative
      • 1.9 Engagement
      • 1.0 Public Reputation
        • 0.9 Public Reputations: General- & Specific-
        • 0.9 Awards
        • 0.0 Flags
      • 0.0 Administrative Reputation
        • 0.9 Bayes adjustment
        • 0.9 demurrage
        • 1.9 Billings Score
        • 1.9 Culculus score
    • 1.9 Guild
      • 0.9 Reputation of guilds
      • 1.0 Parent & Daughter guilds
        • 0.0 Seed Guild
        • 0.0 Regional Language Family
        • 1.0 Guild Creation
        • 0.9 Member
      • 0.9 Ordinal Guild
        • 0.9 Acquisition - Integration _ Proliferation
          • 0.9 Skillset Decay
          • 0.9 Relational Dynamic Adjustment
          • 0.9 Advancement
          • 0.9 Level
        • 0.9 Sourcing and Revising Standards
          • 0.9 Safe Work Practices
          • 0.9 Certifying Body
          • 0.0 Practical Factors (rename)
          • 0.9 Fundamental Domain Competencies
          • 0.9 Standard Operating Procedures
          • 0.9 Guild Certification
    • 1.9 Community Governance Structure
      • 0.8 EVR Community
      • 1.5 Content Moderation
      • 0.9 Code of conduct
      • 0.0 Content
      • 1.0 Disputed Content
        • 1.0 Dilemmas Ethical and Procedural
          • 0.9 Unethical
          • 1.0 Unfitting
      • 0.9 Arbitration Process
        • 0.0 Brief
        • 0.0 Proposal
        • 1.0 Arbitration Threshold
        • 0.0 Determination
        • 0.0 Resolution / Dismissal
        • 1.0 Arbitrating Members
        • 0.0 Activity Status
      • 0.0 Reporting Member
      • 1.0 Potenza Threshold
    • 1.0 EVR Team
      • 0.9 Disaster Relief Protocols
      • 1.0 Ikigai Insights
  • Blue Paper
    • ***Form & function Template***
    • 1.0 Reputations: Public & Administrative
      • 1.9 Engagement
      • 0.9 Public Reputation
        • 0.9 Public Reputation: General- & Specific-
        • 0.1 Flags
      • 0.0 Demurrage
      • 1.0 Bays adjustment
      • 0.0 Awards
    • 1.0 Guild
      • 0.0 Reputation of Guilds
      • 0.9 Guild rep
      • 1.0 Guild Creation
      • 0.0 Seed Guild
      • 0.9 Ordinal Guild
      • 0.9 Guild Certification
      • 0.9 Standard Operating Procedures
      • 0.0 Fundamental Domain Competencies
      • 0.9 Certifying Body
      • 0.9 Acquisition - Integration _ Proliferation
      • 0.9 Sourcing and Revising Standards
      • 0.0 Parent & Daughter guilds
      • 1.0 Member
      • 0.0 Advancement
      • 1.0 EVR Community
      • 0.9 Skillset Decay
      • 0.9 Safe Work Practives
      • 0.9 Level
      • 0.9 Practical Factors (rename)
      • 0.9 Relational Dynamic Adjustment
    • 1.9 Community Governance Structure
      • 1.5 Content Moderation
      • 1.0 Potenza Threshold
      • 1.0 Arbitration Threshold
      • 1.0 Arbitration Process
      • 1.8 Billings Score
      • 0.9 Dilemmas: Ethical and Procedural
      • 1.0 Unfitting
      • 1.0 Unethical
      • 0.0 Activity Status
      • 1.0 Resolution / Dismissal
      • 1.0 Arbitrating Members
      • 1.0 Regional Language Family
      • 1.0 Reporting Member
      • 1.0 Disputed content
      • 1.0 Determination
      • 0.0 Content
      • 0.0 Code of Conduct
      • 1.8 Cuculus score
      • 0.0 Proposal
      • 1.0 Brief
    • 0.0 EVR Team
      • 0.9 Ikigai Insights
      • 0.9 EVR Team
      • 0.0 Disaster Relief Protocols
Powered by GitBook

1.9 Community Governance Structure

The way decisions get made, and conflicts get resolved. _or_ Death by 1000 Bureaucrats

Philosophy

The advantage of bureaucracy is its ability to consolidate and allocate the resources of the body it oversees; its strength measured by its effectiveness at coordinating large numbers of people into an effective body capable of unilateral action. The most pollyanna interpretation of this maintains that we each sacrifice a bit of personal agency to be part of a much stronger collective.

The weakness of bureaucracy is that it's filled with bureaucrats; a special class of person, operating in a wholly different context and with different incentives than those they oversee (represent, manage, administer to... take your pick of corporate friendly terminology here). This disconnection from boots-on-the-ground reality only increases the further up the ladder one goes.

We forgo prescriptive and legislative decrees in favor of consensus seeking mechanisms that are self-regulating and responsive. -With an aim to harness the coordinative capacity of bureaucracy without the need for bureaucrats.

Examples

Brenda wants to create a viticulture subguild from her horticulture guild

Todd sees a troubling post and reports it as an ethical dilemma

Evan thinks his diesel mechanic guild should expand its charter to include gasoline engines.

Form and Function

Previous0.9 Guild CertificationNext0.8 EVR Community

Last updated 11 months ago

On this page
Page cover image